OB Clinical (Nursing)

Rubric Detail

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: TEACHING EXPERIENCE RUBRIC

	Meets or Exceeds	Mostly Meets	Approaches	Does Not Meet Expectations
Comprehensive Assessment	Points: 3.84 (16.00%) Clear and concise discussion of patient’s admission diagnosis, demographic data, and anticipated learning needs,Clear and comprehensive patient assessment data to support a deficient knowledge nursing diagnosis. Feedback:	Points: 2.9184 (12.16%) Vague and incomplete discussion of patient’s admission diagnosis, demographic data, and anticipated learning needs.Vague and incomplete patient assessment data to support deficient knowledge nursing diagnosis. Feedback:	Points: 1.92 (8.00%) Vague and incomplete discussion of patient’s admission diagnosis, demographic data, and anticipated learning needs. Feedback:	Points: 0.96 (4.00%) No discussion of patient’s admission diagnosis, demographic data and anticipated learning needs.No comprehensive patient assessment data to support deficient knowledge. Feedback:
Patient Learning Needs Assessment	Points: 3.84 (16.00%) Clear and complete assessment of learner (patient /family), teaching needs, and special learning needs, if present.Clear identification of patient’s strengths and weaknesses relevant to learning needs. Feedback:	Points: 2.9184 (12.16%) Incomplete assessment of learner (patient and/or family), teaching needs, and special learning needs, if present.Incomplete identification of patient’s strengths and weaknesses relevant to learning needs. Feedback:	Points: 1.92 (8.00%) Incomplete assessment of learner (patient and/or family), teaching needs, and special learning needs, if present. Feedback:	Points: 0.96 (4.00%) No assessment of learner (patient and/or family), teaching needs, and special learning needs, if present.No discussion of patient’s strengths and weaknesses relevant to learning needs Feedback:
Organization/ Evidence-based Information	Points: 4.08 (17.00%) Open and closing remarks that capture patient’s attention.Clear and correct statement of 2 teaching objectives.Clear and organized presentation of evidence-based patient teaching. Feedback:	Points: 3.1008 (12.92%) Open or closing remarks displayed.Vague/incorrect teaching objectives.Vague/disorganized presentation of evidence-based patient teaching Feedback:	Points: 2.04 (8.50%) Open or closing remarks displayed.Vague/incorrect teaching objectives Feedback:	Points: 1.02 (4.25%) No open or closing remarks displayed.No teaching objective stated.Poor or disorganized presentation of teaching from inappropriate sources. Feedback:
Body Language	Points: 4.08 (17.00%) Direct eye contact and appropriate gestures/movements during teaching.Relaxed, self-confident nature and no mistake during teaching. Feedback:	Points: 3.1008 (12.92%) Minimal eye contact and little movement or descriptive gesture during teaching.Mild tension, lack of self-confidence and difficulty recovering from mistakes. Feedback:	Points: 2.04 (8.50%) Minimal eye contact and little movement or descriptive gesture during teaching. Feedback:	Points: 1.02 (4.25%) No eye contact and inappropriate gestures during teaching.Tension and nervousness obvious, trouble recovering from mistakes. Feedback:
Voice	Points: 4.08 (17.00%) Use of clear speech and inflection, maintains the interest of the learner. Feedback:	Points: 3.1008 (12.92%) Some level of inflection and clarity during delivery. Feedback:	Points: 2.04 (8.50%) Monotone voice with some inflection of delivery Feedback:	Points: 1.02 (4.25%) Monotone voice consistently. Feedback:
Learning Evaluation	Points: 4.08 (17.00%) Clear/appropriate evaluation of patient’s response and effectiveness/ineffective ness of teaching.Reflective analysis of teaching including discussion of strengths and weaknesses. Feedback:	Points: 3.1008 (12.92%) Vague/inappropriate evaluation of patient’s response and effectiveness/ ineffectiveness of teaching.Vague reflective analysis of teaching including discussion of strengths and weaknesses. Feedback:	Points: 2.04 (8.50%) Vague/inappropriate evaluation of patient’s response and effectiveness/ ineffectiveness of teaching. Feedback:	Points: 1.02 (4.25%) Vague/inappropriate evaluation of patient’s response and effectiveness/ ineffectiveness of teaching. Vague reflective analysis of teaching including discussion of strengths and weaknesses.Absent reflective Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Comprehensive Assessment–

Levels of Achievement: Meets or Exceeds 3.84 (16.00%) points Clear and concise discussion of patient’s admission diagnosis, demographic data, and anticipated learning needs,Clear and comprehensive patient assessment data to support a deficient knowledge nursing diagnosis. Mostly Meets 2.9184 (12.16%) points Vague and incomplete discussion of patient’s admission diagnosis, demographic data, and anticipated learning needs.Vague and incomplete patient assessment data to support deficient knowledge nursing diagnosis. Approaches 1.92 (8.00%) points Vague and incomplete discussion of patient’s admission diagnosis, demographic data, and anticipated learning needs. Does Not Meet Expectations 0.96 (4.00%) points No discussion of patient’s admission diagnosis, demographic data and anticipated learning needs.No comprehensive patient assessment data to support deficient knowledge. Feedback:

Patient Learning Needs Assessment–

Levels of Achievement: Meets or Exceeds 3.84 (16.00%) points Clear and complete assessment of learner (patient /family), teaching needs, and special learning needs, if present.Clear identification of patient’s strengths and weaknesses relevant to learning needs. Mostly Meets 2.9184 (12.16%) points Incomplete assessment of learner (patient and/or family), teaching needs, and special learning needs, if present.Incomplete identification of patient’s strengths and weaknesses relevant to learning needs. Approaches 1.92 (8.00%) points Incomplete assessment of learner (patient and/or family), teaching needs, and special learning needs, if present. Does Not Meet Expectations 0.96 (4.00%) points No assessment of learner (patient and/or family), teaching needs, and special learning needs, if present.No discussion of patient’s strengths and weaknesses relevant to learning needs Feedback:

Organization/ Evidence-based Information–

Levels of Achievement: Meets or Exceeds 4.08 (17.00%) points Open and closing remarks that capture patient’s attention.Clear and correct statement of 2 teaching objectives.Clear and organized presentation of evidence-based patient teaching. Mostly Meets 3.1008 (12.92%) points Open or closing remarks displayed.Vague/incorrect teaching objectives.Vague/disorganized presentation of evidence-based patient teaching Approaches 2.04 (8.50%) points Open or closing remarks displayed.Vague/incorrect teaching objectives Does Not Meet Expectations 1.02 (4.25%) points No open or closing remarks displayed.No teaching objective stated.Poor or disorganized presentation of teaching from inappropriate sources. Feedback:

Body Language–

Levels of Achievement: Meets or Exceeds 4.08 (17.00%) points Direct eye contact and appropriate gestures/movements during teaching.Relaxed, self-confident nature and no mistake during teaching. Mostly Meets 3.1008 (12.92%) points Minimal eye contact and little movement or descriptive gesture during teaching.Mild tension, lack of self-confidence and difficulty recovering from mistakes. Approaches 2.04 (8.50%) points Minimal eye contact and little movement or descriptive gesture during teaching. Does Not Meet Expectations 1.02 (4.25%) points No eye contact and inappropriate gestures during teaching.Tension and nervousness obvious, trouble recovering from mistakes. Feedback:

Voice–

Levels of Achievement: Meets or Exceeds 4.08 (17.00%) points Use of clear speech and inflection, maintains the interest of the learner. Mostly Meets 3.1008 (12.92%) points Some level of inflection and clarity during delivery. Approaches 2.04 (8.50%) points Monotone voice with some inflection of delivery Does Not Meet Expectations 1.02 (4.25%) points Monotone voice consistently. Feedback:

Learning Evaluation–

Levels of Achievement: Meets or Exceeds 4.08 (17.00%) points Clear/appropriate evaluation of patient’s response and effectiveness/ineffective ness of teaching.Reflective analysis of teaching including discussion of strengths and weaknesses. Mostly Meets 3.1008 (12.92%) points Vague/inappropriate evaluation of patient’s response and effectiveness/ ineffectiveness of teaching.Vague reflective analysis of teaching including discussion of strengths and weaknesses. Approaches 2.04 (8.50%) points Vague/inappropriate evaluation of patient’s response and effectiveness/ ineffectiveness of teaching. Does Not Meet Expectations 1.02 (4.25%) points Vague/inappropriate evaluation of patient’s response and effectiveness/ ineffectiveness of teaching. Vague reflective analysis of teaching including discussion of strengths and weaknesses.Absent reflective Feedback: